Category: Corruption


Via WikiLeaks: Pelosi May Have Known About Imran Awan

Time to get beyond fake news and White House turmoil.  There is one serious issue that needs to be addressed. Don’t count on the MSM to do it!
Some Democrats have apparently been engaged in highly questionable activities, and the Soros dominated MSM will not cover their most egregious actions which border on treaso.
The first post below is and excerpt from the latest regarding the scandal of the century that the MSM refuses to cover. It is followed by segments from just a few of the many articles authored by others who have been heralding what the MSM ignores.

From The Daily Caller:
Establishment Media Refuse To Cover House IT Scandal Rocking Democrats
Leading members of the establishment media are ignoring the months-long House IT scandal rocking congressional Democrats, even after the FBI’s investigation into the matter became public, and even after Democratic Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz’s top IT aide was arrested trying to flee to Pakistan after wiring almost $300,000 to the country.
As of Thursday morning, both the New York Times and Wall Street Journal have yet to report on the growing scandal surrounding several IT staffers employed by House Democrats, including Wasserman Schultz’s top IT aide, Imran Awan.
Other establishment media outlets are similarly refusing to tell the public about the growing scandal. MSNBC has given zero on-air coverage to the scandal. ABC News and NBC News’ national broadcasts have similarly given zero coverage to the scandal. CNN’s only on-air coverage of the scandal so far was a brief mention during the 6 a.m. ET hour Thursday.
As reported by The Daily Caller News Foundation’s Luke Rosiak — who for months has extensively covered the growing scandal — Awan was arrested on Monday as he attempted to flee the country to Pakistan after wiring almost $300,000 to the country. The FBI seized smashed hard drives from Awan’s home as part of the ongoing investigation. (RELATED: FBI Seized Smashed Hard Drives From Wasserman Schultz IT Aide’s Home)
The Pakistani-born Awan attempted to flee the country shortly after Rosiak’s report that he was the subject of an FBI investigation. Awan’s wife, who was also on congressional Democrats’ payroll, previously fled to Pakistan, as first reported by Rosiak. continue

From Powdered Wig Society:
If this case, which begins with the Awan brothers and goes to the highest levels of Congress, is pursued with a fraction of the energy and resources that have been expended on the Russian fairy tale, then I believe many people are going to jail and some of them are high-profile Democrat members of Congress.
We are just beginning to scratch the surface, but so far we know that there are ties between some of those involved and the Muslim Brotherhood, and that Top Secret national security information may well have been, and very likely was, compromised… FrontPage Magazine.
The signatories to the letter were Andre Carson, Luis Guiterez, Jim Himes, Terri Sewell, Jackie Speier, Mike Quigley, Eric Swalwell and Patrick Murphy.

Pamela Geller has written extensively on this issue: below is an excerpt on one of many of her articles.
Rep Steve King: Democrat Muslim IT spy ring is “an enormous act of treason, a lot of people complicit” had access to “all the communication of the Foreign Affairs Committee”
There is a reason the fake newsmedia is filling the airwaves with Trump/Russia bunk. It’s the old sleight of hand. Don’t look there, look here?
Where’s Jeff Sessions? Where the hell is everyone?
The scandal goes all the way to the top – Clinton and Pelosi. The list of those reportedly employing the Awans and their associates includes these 23 current or former Democrats in Congress, including: Andre Carson, Luis Guiterez, Jim Himes, Terri Sewell, Jackie Speier, Mike Quigley, Eric Swalwell, Patrick Murphy, Debbie Wasserman Schultz, Joaquini Castro, Lois Frankel, Ted Lieu, Robin Kelly, Tammy Duckworth, Mark Takano, John Sarbanes, Diana DeGette, Cedric Richmond, Charlie Crist, Jacky Rosen, Sandy Levin, Karen Bass and Marcia Fudge… continue At the end of this post are links with many more alarming details on the matter.

Daily Caller:
Chris Gowen, Imran Awan’s lawyer, is a long-time campaigner for former President Bill Clinton and former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and a member of an attorney team that brought a fraudulent lawsuit against energy giant Chevron.
Pakistani-born Awan was arrested late Monday at Dulles Airport in Northern Virginia before he could board a flight to Qatar and then Pakistan on bank fraud charges. Awan, his younger brothers, Abid and Jamal, his wife, Hina Alvi, and Rao Abbas, his best friend, have been subjects of a federal criminal investigation led by the U.S. Capitol Police and including the FBI since February 2017. more

Gateway Pundit
Via WikiLeaks: Pelosi May Have Known About Imran AwanJ 
Don’t look to the mainstream media to tell you how troubling the situation with the Awan brothers is. It’s worse than you think. After Imran Awan was arrested this week for trying to flee the country, WikiLeaks’ Julian Assange reminded his 279,000 Twitter followers of an email link between Imran Awan and House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi. (emphasis mine)  continue
There appears to be a more horrendous scandal in association with the above discussed one–the blatant refusal of the Democrats and the MSM to acknowledge, much less investigate such an obvious act of betrayal and possible treason against America.
The Democrat leadership does not serve this nation. Apparently they serve and protect not only themselves, but also the elites and globalists—- which includes many of them.

What!? Bernie Sanders caught stealing neighbor’s newspaper

Vermont Senator Bernie Sanders must be falling on hard times – because he’s alleged been helping himself to free handouts.

With his wife’s FBI investigation for bank fraud heating up, the senator has apparently resorted to stealing his neighbor’s subscription of the Washington Post.

Yes, you read that right.

Sanders is taking his socialist values to the extreme, and decided his neighbor should share his Washington Post wealth.

According to political radio commentator, Chris Plante, Sanders has been taking the newspaper out of his next-door neighbor’s yard without him knowing!

Plante tells a story he heard that involves Sanders’ neighbor calling the Washington Post and complaining about not receiving the Sunday paper for several weeks.

The newspaper contacted the local delivery boy who reportedly sees “an older man with gray hair, balding, and little round glasses” immediately come and grab the paper on Sunday mornings.

The now confused man says, ““I’m in my 50s, and I’ve got a full head of dark hair…”

The kicker?

“…But, my neighbor is Bernie Sanders,” the man claims.

So, it looks like Bernie is enforcing his Socialist agenda on the public whether they want it or not!

The Sanders’ seemingly cannot afford to buy their own subscription of the newspaper (perhaps due to Jane’s mismanagement of funds?), so they are turning this man’s private property into social wealth.

This is all coming from the guy who, according to FoxNews, was once kicked out of a commune for refusing to do any work!

Does this confirm that Socialists are lazy freeloaders?

Maybe.

“He’s redistributing his neighbor’s Washington Post” like a true Socialist, laughed Plante.

Despite his failed presidential campaign in 2016, an associate of Sanders announced on Monday that Bernie has been considering a 2020 presidential run.

Go here for radio broadcast on the story

As usual the bought and paid for lapdog MSM & previous administration ignored these findings because they would have wrecked the very foundation of the Russiagate narrative.

NSA Officials and Computer Expert: Forensic Evidence Proves DNC Emails Were LEAKED, Not Hacked

Preface by Washington’s Blog: We asked top NSA whistleblower Bill Binney what he thought about a report claiming that the DNC emails were transferred too quickly to have been accessed by a hacker, and could only have been copied by a DNC leaker. This article is his response.   Background here and here.
MEMORANDUM FOR: The President
FROM: Veteran Intelligence Professionals for Sanity (VIPS)
SUBJECT: Was the “Russian Hack” an Inside Job?
Executive Summary
Forensic studies of “Russian hacking” into Democratic National Committee computers last year reveal that on July 5, 2016, data was leaked (not hacked) by a person with physical access to DNC computers, and then doctored to incriminate Russia.
After examining metadata from the “Guccifer 2.0” July 5, 2016 intrusion into the DNC server, independent cyber investigators have concluded that an insider copied DNC data onto an external storage device, and that “telltale signs” implicating Russia were then inserted.
Key among the findings of the independent forensic investigations is the conclusion that the DNC data was copied onto a storage device at a speed that far exceeds an Internet capability for a remote hack. Of equal importance, the forensics show that the copying and doctoring were performed on the East coast of the U.S. Thus far, mainstream media have ignored the findings of these independent studies [see here and here].

Independent analyst Skip Folden, a retired IBM Program Manager for Information Technology US, who examined the recent forensic findings, is a co-author of this Memorandum. He has drafted a more detailed technical report titled “Cyber-Forensic Investigation of ‘Russian Hack’ and Missing Intelligence Community Disclaimers,” and sent it to the offices of the Special Counsel and the Attorney General. VIPS member William Binney, a former Technical Director at the National Security Agency, and other senior NSA “alumni” in VIPS attest to the professionalism of the independent forensic findings.
The recent forensic studies fill in a critical gap. Why the FBI neglected to perform any independent forensics on the original “Guccifer 2.0” material remains a mystery – as does the lack of any sign that the “hand-picked analysts” from the FBI, CIA, and NSA, who wrote the “Intelligence Community Assessment” dated January 6, 2017, gave any attention to forensics.
NOTE: There has been so much conflation of charges about hacking that we wish to make very clear the primary focus of this Memorandum. We focus specifically on the July 5, 2016 alleged Guccifer 2.0 “hack” of the DNC server. In earlier VIPS memoranda we addressed the lack of any evidence connecting the Guccifer 2.0 alleged hacks and WikiLeaks, and we asked President Obama specifically to disclose any evidence that WikiLeaks received DNC data from the Russians [see here and here].
Addressing this point at his last press conference (January 18), he described “the conclusions of the intelligence community” as “not conclusive,” even though the Intelligence Community Assessment of January 6 expressed “high confidence” that Russian intelligence “relayed material it acquired from the DNC … to WikiLeaks.”
Obama’s admission came as no surprise to us. It has long been clear to us that the reason the U.S. government lacks conclusive evidence of a transfer of a “Russian hack” to WikiLeaks is because there was no such transfer. Based mostly on the cumulatively unique technical experience of our ex-NSA colleagues, we have been saying for almost a year that the DNC data reached WikiLeaks via a copy/leak by a DNC insider (but almost certainly not the same person who copied DNC data on July 5, 2016).
From the information available, we conclude that the same inside-DNC, copy/leak process was used at two different times, by two different entities, for two distinctly different purposes:

-(1) an inside leak to WikiLeaks before Julian Assange announced on June 12, 2017, that he had DNC documents and planned to publish them (which he did on July 22) – the presumed objective being to expose strong DNC bias toward the Clinton candidacy; and
-(2) a separate leak on July 5, 2016, to pre-emptively taint anything WikiLeaks might later publish by “showing” it came from a “Russian hack.”
*  *  *
Mr. President:
This is our first VIPS Memorandum for you, but we have a history of letting U.S. Presidents know when we think our former intelligence colleagues have gotten something important wrong, and why. For example, our first such memorandum, a same-day commentary for President George W. Bush on Colin Powell’s U.N. speech on March 5, 2003, warned that the “unintended consequences were likely to be catastrophic,” should the U.S. attack Iraq and “justfy” the war on intelligence that we retired intelligence officers could readily see as fraudulent and driven by a war agenda.
The January 6 “Intelligence Community Assessment” by “hand-picked” analysts from the FBI, CIA, and NSA seems to fit into the same agenda-driven category. It is largely based on an “assessment,” not supported by any apparent evidence, that a shadowy entity with the moniker “Guccifer 2.0” hacked the DNC on behalf of Russian intelligence and gave DNC emails to WikiLeaks.
The recent forensic findings mentioned above have put a huge dent in that assessment and cast serious doubt on the underpinnings of the extraordinarily successful campaign to blame the Russian government for hacking. The pundits and politicians who have led the charge against Russian “meddling” in the U.S. election can be expected to try to cast doubt on the forensic findings, if they ever do bubble up into the mainstream media. But the principles of physics don’t lie; and the technical limitations of today’s Internet are widely understood. We are prepared to answer any substantive challenges on their merits.
You may wish to ask CIA Director Mike Pompeo what he knows about this. Our own lengthy intelligence community experience suggests that it is possible that neither former CIA Director John Brennan, nor the cyber-warriors who worked for him, have been completely candid with their new director regarding how this all went down.
Copied, Not Hacked
As indicated above, the independent forensic work just completed focused on data copied (not hacked) by a shadowy persona named “Guccifer 2.0.” The forensics reflect what seems to have been a desperate effort to “blame the Russians” for publishing highly embarrassing DNC emails three days before the Democratic convention last July. Since the content of the DNC emails reeked of pro-Clinton bias, her campaign saw an overriding need to divert attention from content to provenance – as in, who “hacked” those DNC emails? The campaign was enthusiastically supported by a compliant “mainstream” media; they are still on a roll.
“The Russians” were the ideal culprit. And, after WikiLeaks editor Julian Assange announced on June 12, 2016, “We have emails related to Hillary Clinton which are pending publication,” her campaign had more than a month before the convention to insert its own “forensic facts” and prime the media pump to put the blame on “Russian meddling.” Mrs. Clinton’s PR chief Jennifer Palmieri has explained how she used golf carts to make the rounds at the convention. She wrote that her “mission was to get the press to focus on something even we found difficult to process: the prospect that Russia had not only hacked and stolen emails from the DNC, but that it had done so to help Donald Trump and hurt Hillary Clinton.”
Independent cyber-investigators have now completed the kind of forensic work that the intelligence assessment did not do. Oddly, the “hand-picked” intelligence analysts contented themselves with “assessing” this and “assessing” that. In contrast, the investigators dug deep and came up with verifiable evidence from metadata found in the record of the alleged Russian hack.
They found that the purported “hack” of the DNC by Guccifer 2.0 was not a hack, by Russia or anyone else. Rather it originated with a copy (onto an external storage device – a thumb drive, for example) by an insider. The data was leaked after being doctored with a cut-and-paste job to implicate Russia. We do not know who or what the murky Guccifer 2.0 is. You may wish to ask the FBI.
The Time Sequence
June 12, 2016: Assange announces WikiLeaks is about to publish “emails related to Hillary Clinton.”
June 15, 2016: DNC contractor Crowdstrike, (with a dubious professional record and multiple conflicts of interest) announces that malware has been found on the DNC server and claims there is evidence it was injected by Russians.
June 15, 2016: On the same day, “Guccifer 2.0” affirms the DNC statement; claims responsibility for the “hack;” claims to be a WikiLeaks source; and posts a document that the forensics show was synthetically tainted with “Russian fingerprints.”
We do not think that the June 12 & 15 timing was pure coincidence. Rather, it suggests the start of a pre-emptive move to associate Russia with anything WikiLeaks might have been about to publish and to “show” that it came from a Russian hack.
The Key Event
July 5, 2016: In the early evening, Eastern Daylight Time, someone working in the EDT time zone with a computer directly connected to the DNC server or DNC Local Area Network, copied 1,976 MegaBytes of data in 87 seconds onto an external storage device. That speed is many times faster than what is physically possible with a hack.
It thus appears that the purported “hack” of the DNC by Guccifer 2.0 (the self-proclaimed WikiLeaks source) was not a hack by Russia or anyone else, but was rather a copy of DNC data onto an external storage device. Moreover, the forensics performed on the metadata reveal there was a subsequent synthetic insertion – a cut-and-paste job using a Russian template, with the clear aim of attributing the data to a “Russian hack.” This was all performed in the East Coast time zone.
“Obfuscation & De-obfuscation”
Mr. President, the disclosure described below may be related. Even if it is not, it is something we think you should be made aware of in this general connection. On March 7, 2017, WikiLeaks began to publish a trove of original CIA documents that WikiLeaks labeled “Vault 7.” WikiLeaks said it got the trove from a current or former CIA contractor and described it as comparable in scale and significance to the information Edward Snowden gave to reporters in 2013.
No one has challenged the authenticity of the original documents of Vault 7, which disclosed a vast array of cyber warfare tools developed, probably with help from NSA, by CIA’s Engineering Development Group. That Group was part of the sprawling CIA Directorate of Digital Innovation – a growth industry established by John Brennan in 2015.
Scarcely imaginable digital tools – that can take control of your car and make it race over 100 mph, for example, or can enable remote spying through a TV – were described and duly reported in the New York Times and other media throughout March. But the Vault 7, part 3 release on March 31 that exposed the “Marble Framework” program apparently was judged too delicate to qualify as “news fit to print” and was kept out of the Times.
The Washington Post’s Ellen Nakashima, it seems, “did not get the memo” in time. Her March 31 article bore the catching (and accurate) headline: “WikiLeaks’ latest release of CIA cyber-tools could blow the cover on agency hacking operations.”
The WikiLeaks release indicated that Marble was designed for flexible and easy-to-use “obfuscation,” and that Marble source code includes a “deobfuscator” to reverse CIA text obfuscation.
More important, the CIA reportedly used Marble during 2016. In her Washington Post report, Nakashima left that out, but did include another significant point made by WikiLeaks; namely, that the obfuscation tool could be used to conduct a “forensic attribution double game” or false-flag operation because it included test samples in Chinese, Russian, Korean, Arabic and Farsi.
The CIA’s reaction was neuralgic. Director Mike Pompeo lashed out two weeks later, calling Assange and his associates “demons,” and insisting, “It’s time to call out WikiLeaks for what it really is, a non-state hostile intelligence service, often abetted by state actors like Russia.”
Mr. President, we do not know if CIA’s Marble Framework, or tools like it, played some kind of role in the campaign to blame Russia for hacking the DNC. Nor do we know how candid the denizens of CIA’s Digital Innovation Directorate have been with you and with Director Pompeo. These are areas that might profit from early White House review.
Putin and the Technology
We also do not know if you have discussed cyber issues in any detail with President Putin. In his interview with NBC’s Megyn Kelly, he seemed quite willing – perhaps even eager – to address issues related to the kind of cyber tools revealed in the Vault 7 disclosures, if only to indicate he has been briefed on them. Putin pointed out that today’s technology enables hacking to be “masked and camouflaged to an extent that no one can understand the origin” [of the hack] … And, vice versa, it is possible to set up any entity or any individual that everyone will think that they are the exact source of that attack.”
“Hackers may be anywhere,” he said. “There may be hackers, by the way, in the United States who very craftily and professionally passed the buck to Russia. Can’t you imagine such a scenario? … I can.”
Full Disclosure: Over recent decades the ethos of our intelligence profession has eroded in the public mind to the point that agenda-free analysis is deemed well nigh impossible. Thus, we add this disclaimer, which applies to everything we in VIPS say and do: We have no political agenda; our sole purpose is to spread truth around and, when necessary, hold to account our former intelligence colleagues.
We speak and write without fear or favor. Consequently, any resemblance between what we say and what presidents, politicians and pundits say is purely coincidental. The fact we find it is necessary to include that reminder speaks volumes about these highly politicized times. This is our 50th VIPS Memorandum since the afternoon of Powell’s speech at the UN. Live links to the 49 past memos can be found at https://consortiumnews.com/vips-memos/.
FOR THE STEERING GROUP, VETERAN INTELLIGENCE PROFESSIONALS FOR SANITY
William Binney, former NSA Technical Director for World Geopolitical & Military Analysis; Co-founder of NSA’s Signals Intelligence Automation Research Center
Skip Folden, independent analyst, retired IBM Program Manager for Information Technology US (Associate VIPS)
Matthew Hoh, former Capt., USMC, Iraq & Foreign Service Officer, Afghanistan (associate VIPS)
Michael S. Kearns, Air Force Intelligence Officer (Ret.), Master SERE Resistance to Interrogation Instructor
John Kiriakou, Former CIA Counterterrorism Officer and former Senior Investigator, Senate Foreign Relations Committee
Linda Lewis, WMD preparedness policy analyst, USDA (ret.)
Lisa Ling, TSgt USAF (ret.) (associate VIPS)
Edward Loomis, Jr., former NSA Technical Director for the Office of Signals Processing
David MacMichael, National Intelligence Council (ret.)
Ray McGovern, former U.S. Army Infantry/Intelligence officer and CIA analyst
Elizabeth Murray, former Deputy National Intelligence Officer for Middle East, CIA
Coleen Rowley, FBI Special Agent and former Minneapolis Division Legal Counsel (ret.)
Cian Westmoreland, former USAF Radio Frequency Transmission Systems Technician and Unmanned Aircraft Systems whistleblower (Associate VIPS)
Kirk Wiebe, former Senior Analyst, SIGINT Automation Research Center, NSA
Sarah G. Wilton, Intelligence Officer, DIA (ret.); Commander, US Naval Reserve (ret.)
Ann Wright, U.S. Army Reserve Colonel (ret) and former U.S. Diplomat

Source:Zero Hedge 

Knowledge Is Power: The Realistic Observer is a non-profit blog dedicated to bringing as much truth as possible to the readers.

If you weren’t certain that the people behind the infamous dossier on Donald Trump and Russia were hiding something before, their actions in the past week should put it beyond a certainty. The Senate Intelligence Committee sent a request to Glenn Simpson, the co-founder of opposition research firm Fusion GPS to testify before them this week. Simpson, through his lawyer, released a statement on Friday declining the invitation…supposedly because he is “on vacation.” Of course, that it not the only reason he’ll be unavailable to speak in Washington. His lawyer also said that “partisan agendas” were taking root in congressional investigations, causing Simpson to grow “profoundly disturbed” with the direction of the inquiry.

Perhaps because that inquiry is getting closer and closer to the truth?

In any event, the statement irritated Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley, who subsequently issued a subpoena demanding that Simpson appear in Washington on Wednesday. Citing the charge that Simpson may have failed to register as a foreign agent in his work for Fusion GPS, Grassley said he would expect to see the opposition researcher in front of the Senate Intelligence Committee. His lawyer once again declined, insisting that while Simpson may appear, he will only do so to invoke his Fifth Amendment right not to incriminate himself.

“This hearing’s purported focus on FARA [the Foreign Agents Registration Act] is pretext for an exploration of Fusion GPS’ reported work, on behalf of other clients, to investigate the ties of Donald J. Trump, his campaign and their associates to Russia,” said Simpson’s lawyer.

Yes, well, that’s probably true to an extent. The problem is that Simpson’s lawyer presents this scenario as though there’s some epic Republican ruse going on here to drag his client’s good name through the mud. The reality is quite a bit more nuanced. As all sides agree, the Russians had some degree of involvement in meddling in the 2016 election. And there’s no question that Fusion GPS and the dossier they produced through their funding of former British spy Christopher Steele played a part in that meddling to one degree or another. Therefore, it is very much a direct aspect of the Senate’s investigation into those matters for them to get to the bottom of that dossier, figure out who was ultimately paying Fusion GPS for their work, and even determine how and why Fusion was involved in setting up that controversial meeting between Donald Trump’s campaign team and that Russian lawyer last June.

The very existence of the dossier – much of which has been discredited by the U.S. intelligence community – is proof that Fusion GPS, their clients, and the Russians were out to destroy Trump in some form or fashion. It’s not beyond the scope of Congressional investigation to demand some answers about that sensitive topic.

The action pictured above is also happening in certain areas of the U.S.
The sheer size of America dilutes the impact overall, but in areas where it does take place, it is most definitely felt. The difference between Europe and most of America is that in the U.S., the “authorities” can attempt to cover up Islamic crimes for so long without irate push back from the citizenry.
Also, all over America, angry parents are challenging the teaching of Islam in the public schools that goes far beyond a historical context and plunges into outright religious indoctrination.
There are flabby brained local American officials who try desperately either out of ignorance, Dhimmitude, or treachery, to counter any so called Islamophobia. Many of the new migrants feel they have the right, indeed the obligation, to harass, beat up, and rape non Muslim women, children and even men. Demands by the public for the effective dealing with such Islamic crimes are met with derision and/or incalcitrance by many local governing bodies. They cite the approved narrative—accusations of racism, Islamophobia, the benefit of resulting economic growth, bla bla bla. In reality, they are undoubtedly receiving financial compensation for housing refugees, and many local employers benefit from cheap factory labor. Most Americans do not buy the obviously choreographed song and dance.
There are a plethora of blogs on this issue, but one of the most informative and targeted is Ann Corcoran’s Refugee Resettlement Watch, a treasure trove of information.
Prior to the influx of migrants resulting from the deftly engineered unrest in the Middle East, courtesy of the Muslim Brotherhood’s allies in certain Western Leaderships, there were Muslim communities in the West that were largely peaceful, taxpaying citizens, and barely noticeable to the non-Muslim population. The present migrants are of an entirely different breed. Many are radicalized, openly hostile, threatening, and refuse to assimilate into their host nations’ way of life. They bring chaos and blatantly declare their intention to eventually seek cultural conquest of the native populations. They are devouring their hosts piece by piece. Now many nations which accepted large numbers of these de facto invaders, are on the edge of the cliff. Some appear to have fallen over, courtesy of their ineffective and/or treacherous leadership.
The following post discusses Sweden, whose overtaxed law enforcement  has sounded the clarion and are openly acknowledging what has been the case all along, they need help. The police seem to get it, but the political leadership remains befuddled over the rise of Islamic extremism and chooses to remain at sea over the entire issue. Are they being threatened, blackmailed, or acting as NWO agents seeking the destruction of their own nation in the name of “World Peace” and “equality” for all.

Sweden Faces The Abyss; National Police Head Begs For Help
July 21, 2017 JoshuaPundit

Sweden’s National Police Commissioner, Dan Eliasson, recently spoke on national television and shocked his fellow Swedes by pleading for assistance. “Help us, help us!,” he said, while warning that Swedish police forces no longer can uphold the law and therefore must ask all “good powers” in the country to support them. Sweden faces the abyss of lawlessness and perhaps even a defacto civil war.
Commissioner Eliasson’s remarks reflect a shocking change for the worse in what used to be one of Europe’s most peaceful and law abiding countries.
A leaked report concluded that the number of “no-go zones”) in Sweden now totals 61, up from 55 in just one year’s time. This increase represents not only the total number, but also the geographical size of these areas. The Swedish authorities themselves refer to these areas as utenforskap, which roughly translates as ‘excluded areas.’ What it amounts to is that Muslim gangs are carving out territory for themselves where they’re the ones in control, not the Swedish authorities.
Police chief Lars Alversjø says that, “There is lawlessness in parts of Stockholm now.” He also said, “The legal system, which is a pillar in every democratic society, is collapsing in Sweden.”


One interesting sign of this is a shocking rise of female genital mutilation (FGM), unheard of in Sweden until recently. A new report partly written by SVT, the Swedish state media, reported that at least 150,000 women in Sweden have experienced genital mutilation. This procedure can involve partial or complete removal of the clitoris (i.e., clitoridectomy, clitorectomy or infibulation) plus excision of the labia as well. All too often, this operation is performed on pre teen girls as young as 4 or 5 years old by people who are not licensed medial practitioners in unsterile conditions, and without anesthesia. The actual numbers of women living in Sweden who have experienced FGM may be far higher.
In 2015, there was a report that something like “only” 38,000 women had experienced genital mutilation. The new report shows how this has skyrocketed, even though it is illegal in Sweden.
Sexual assaults have increased as well. New data from Sweden’s national bureau for statistics, BRÅ says that 3,430 rapes was reported the first six months of 2017, up 14 percent compared to the previous half-year. In all, 9,680 sexual crimes was committed from January to June. According to a BRÅ report from 2013,only 23 percent of sexual crimes in Sweden are reported, which means that we can extrapolate the real number of sexual crimes the last six months in Sweden amounts to around 42,000.

According to statistics,92 percent of all severe rapes (violent rapes) are committed by migrants and refugees. 100 percent of all attack rapes (where victim and attacker had no previous contact) are committed by that same group. The countries of origin for the refugees who committed those rapes, in order of the number of perpetrators are Afghanistan, Somalia, Eritrea, Syria, Gambia, Iran, Palestine, and Kosovo. Migrants and refugees from Afghanistan are79 times more likely to commit rape than Swedes.
Another indication of how badly things are going are the efforts by Sweden’s Left wing government to hide them. Being critical of Islam, the Swedish government’s refugee policies or how individual members of the government are handling this crisis can get you a hefty fine, or in some cases even a jail sentence…or both.
But things are progressing to the point where it is getting harder and harder to hide what’s going on.
Magnus Ranstorp is a researcher into terrorism and radicalization at the Swedish National Defense College. Writing about the current situation in Sweden, he noted, “In the worst areas, extremists have taken over. The whole sense of justice and peace are threatened by the fact that the police is breaking down and it’s only getting worse. Sweden is in a disastrous situation”
2011 recipient of Sweden’s Order of the Seraphim medal, Johan Patrik Engellau, a research expert regarding destabilized countries, has been working with organizations such as the UN and others that operate in crisis areas.His take oin this is interesting as well, especially in view of thinking of Sweden as a ‘crisis area.’
“I’m afraid it is the end for the well-organized, decent, and egalitarian Sweden we have known up to now. Personally, I would not be surprised if a form of civil war occurs. In some places, the civil war has probably already begun.”
READ Sweden’s Clueless Government Puzzled Over ‘Rise In Islamic Extremism’
“The government does not seem to understand that it has lost control. There is a point where you can no longer stop a situation’s development. I do not know if Sweden has reached this point when it comes to the consequences of immigration, but I fear we are drawing close. If we right here and now take and clear and powerful action – including stopping immigration and the political promotion of multiculturalism – we might with some difficulty be able to save Sweden.”
Difficulty might just be the word for it. Sweden’s entire regular military consists of under 10,000 men in all branches of service, army, air force and navy. They have perhaps as many as reserves. The Hemvärnet, a sort of part time home guard has perhaps another 14,000.
There ar4e questions, even from within Sweden as to whether that’s enough military to defend Sweden, especially from a homeland insurrection. Lt. Col. Johan Wiktorin (ret.), a leading Swedish security consultant has been quite vocal about saying that Sweden’s military is “simply too small to defend its territory.” And remember, while Col. Wiktorin is thinking in terms of Russia, what we’re talking about here is controlling an area of 170,000 square miles in a conflict that would include urban warfare, only using Sweden’s land forces. And it’s also worth remembering that this kind of conflict is one in which a number of Sweden’s ‘guests’ have experience in places like Syria and Iraq.
So Sweden faces the abyss, whether its government wants to acknowledge it or not. What happens next? We’ll see.
Rob Miller writes for Joshuapundit. His articles have appeared in The Jerusalem Post, The Washington Examiner, American Thinker, The Los Angeles Times, The Atlanta Journal-Constitution, The San Francisco Chronicle, Real Clear Politics, The Times Of Israel, Breitbart.Com and other publications.

Source: WOW Magazine

Knowledge Is Power: The Realistic Observer is a non-profit blog dedicated to bringing as much truth as possible to the readers.

Or, as the narrator puts it, he’s “a brilliant talker, and when he was arguing some difficult point he had a way of skipping from side to side and whisking his tail which was somehow very persuasive. The others said of Squealer that he could turn black into white” (2.2). He’s the one-pig PR outfit of Napoleon’s regime, with a quick mind, nimble tongue, and absolutely no morals whatsoever.

Do the characteristics of the above minister of truth remind the reader of anyone or any organization in particular?
No two ways about it, the leftist idea of a “utopia” is a place called Animal Farm where all are created equal, but some are more equal than others.
And now the New York Times is calling for a de facto Ministry Of Truth to muzzle Conservative speakers on the basis that they incite hate. Conservatives and their thoughts must be banned because they are a threat to freedom of speech. All speech and thoughts must now support the narrative in order to be heard.
The entire concept leaves rational thinking people wondering if they have gone through the looking glass or stumbled into an alternative Orwellian universe.
The following perversity must be challenged, lest we fall into the abyss of a dystopian world of newsspeak, groupthink, and doublethink.

New York Times Makes Stunning Call for Conservative Censorship 07/18/2017 / By admin
Psychology Professor Lisa Feldman Barrett had a question for New York Times readers on Sunday, and you can probably already imagine what her answer was, given the outlet. “When is Speech Violence?” Barrett asked, and her answer was that it is essentially a form of violence when words have a deteriorating effect on a person’s health and their way of life. As you might have guessed, she concludes that such effects are manifest in the speeches given by controversial conservative speakers – many of whom have been banned from college campuses in recent months.

“That’s why it’s reasonable, scientifically speaking, not to allow a provocateur and hatemonger like Milo Yiannopoulos to speak at your school,” she writes. “He is part of something noxious, a campaign of abuse. There is nothing to be gained from debating him, for debate is not what he is offering.”

Scientifically speaking! Which means that Barrett searched high and low to find studies that prove that speech can have an effect on the mental and physical health of minorities, perhaps overlooking that this can only be true when said minorities ALLOW it to have such an effect. And certainly overlooking the fact that there is no study on the planet that proves that the specific speeches of Milo Yiannopoulos or Ann Coulter have ever shortened the lives of any of their listeners. Although this may become true in time – not because of their words, but because the country is waiting breathlessly for movements like AntiFa to move past lighting campuses on fire and onto simply shooting those with whom they disagree. The ones who die are unlikely to be the fragile minorities Barrett is so desperate to protect, of course.
But this is an argument that’s growing more and more common on the left. It lies at the core of their most ridiculous needs: Safe spaces, trigger warnings, police alerts that ignore the race of the perpetrator, and so on. They equate speech with violence, which gives them a special vehicle with which they can navigate around that pesky First Amendment and use censorship as a weapon. And in all of this, of course, they are gladly willing to ignore the very real and very loud calls for violence on the left. If they give them any attention at all, they treat them as bafflingly rare exceptions to the rule – miscreants barely worth noticing.

Eventually, this will move beyond campus policies and into the halls of Congress and into the realm of the Supreme Court. At that point, our country will have to decide if we would rather put up with a bit of “abusive” speech in the name of freedom or if we would rather enact hate speech codes, the likes of which are curtailing right-wing rhetoric in Europe and Canada.

Let’s hope we make the right choice, because there won’t come a second chance.

Source: Total Conservative

Knowledge Is Power: The Realistic Observer is a non-profit blog dedicated to bringing as much truth as possible to the readers.

Sickening how law enforcement caved under the fear of being accused of Islamophobia, racism etc. Helpless children were literally sacrificed on the alter of Political Correctness! For everlasting shame upon the Dhimmies who initiated this policy. Must we lose our morals, principles, cultural identity, and toss our legal system and de facto submit to Islam in the name of respect and multiculturalism?

This pernicious trend is taking root in America and much has been written about the following, which is above outrage.
Excerpt: “A seven-year-old Iraqi boy, plus 14-year-old and 10-year-old Sudanese boys, reportedly cornered the tiny victim in a laundry room at the Fawnbrook Apartments in Twin Falls, Idaho, on June 2. They stripped her naked, sexually assaulted her, urinated all over her body and in her mouth, and videotaped the attack, according to witnesses
An Obama administration official also threatened to prosecute and punish private citizens discussing the crime and refugee resettlement. “The spread of false information or inflammatory or threatening statements about the perpetrators or the crime itself reduces public safety and may violate federal law. We have seen time and again that the spread of falsehoods about refugees divides our communities,” said U.S. Attorney Wendy J. Olson last June. She later repackaged her threat into a warning about “harassing communications” against public officials, which is not illegal activity.”

How many such incidents have happened in the U.S. that have been swept under the rug?  How many more victims and citizens were threatened into silence? Cover-up is the order of the day in Europe as well. What is behind the complicit behavior of so many Western leaders that they refuse to admit the truth? Nobody can be so stupid as not to see the de facto destruction of their cultures. Those leaders who do stand up and refuse to allow the rape of their countries are threatened with sanctions by the EU. They continue to stand against the threats.

The following article contains excellent information with many links at the end.

Upwards of a million infidel girls have been raped, trafficked and traded by thousands Muslim child sex gangs in the UK, and nothing has been done. These Muslim gangs act with impunity because they know they have a special status — a supremacist status sanctioned by the state.
“We are 15 years on now and there is not one senior police officer that has been held accountable – most of them have retired with big pensions.”
These children were sold like meat right under the noses of authorities, who knew but did nothing for fear of being “islamophobic,” or even more absurdly, “racist” (Islam is not a race).
Submission and surrender to the most vicious and brutal ideology on the face of the earth. The rape and trafficking of infidel girls by Muslims in the UK is no different from the rape and trafficking of Yazidi girls in Iraq or the rape and trafficking of Christian girls by Boko Haram in Nigeria.

Sex slavery, rape and trafficking is all according to Islamic law (sharia).
“Prosperous are the believers who in their prayers are humble and from idle talk turn away and at almsgiving are active and guard their private parts save from their wives and what their right hands own then being not blameworthy.” (Quran 23:1-6)

 A RAPIST IS A RAPIST

Rochdale cop says fears of being accused of racism led to police to shelving paedo ring investigations
She appeared on Lorraine this morning ahead of a new documentary delving deeper into the horrors experienced by the teenagers

By Ellie Cambridge, The Sun, 3rd July 2017:
She appeared on Lorraine this morning ahead of a new documentary delving deeper into the horrors experienced by the teenagers
By Ellie Cambridge, 3rd July 2017:
A ROCHDALE cop who fought to expose the grooming rings today slammed the police force for failing to tackle the abuse.
She appeared on Lorraine this morning to talk about a new documentary looking at the investigations
Maggie is a former detective constable in Greater Manchester Police who resigned claiming hundreds of cases of alleged abuse were mishandled or ignored.
Today she said she believes class divide and fears of being accused of racism caused police to change their response to the investigation.
She said: “It still chokes me up. There are some things on the TV that I just cannot watch but I have done my very best to get this message out into the public arena.
“For me this isn’t just a problem for GMP and Rochdale, for me this comes from the top and the documentary takes the issue of the grooming back to 2003 and Operation Augusta that was an identical job to Operation Span but it was dropped and we had I think 97 offenders on our database and GMP dropped that job.”
She worked on a small team assigned to Operation Augusta which looked at allegations about the grooming of white girls in the north west of England by Pakistani men in 2004.
It found 26 teenage girls were thought to have had underage sex and a list of 208 potential suspects was drawn up.
She believes class divide and fears of being accused of being racist caused police to change their response to the investigation
When Oliver returned to work following a family bereavement she found the inquiry had been abandoned and she says it was not looked into again until 2008.
When asked what she thought GMP were “scared of” she said: “Being accused of being racist perhaps, causing riots. I know that Operation Augusta was shelved or buried when the London bombing went off.
“Until that time we had a full investigation, there was not another entry entered on to that system after the London bombings.”
She added: “All those victims that have been abused in that intervening period and even to this day I draw it to a comparison to the Grenfell Tower, for now we don’t know how many victims but probably well in excess of 100 – heads have rolled very quickly.
“We are 15 years on now and there is not one senior police officer that has been held accountable – most of them have retired with big pensions.“I think it’s gone way beyond the racial debate, I see it as a class debate also.
“It’s ‘them and us’ these girls had no voice, just like the people that they stuck in Grenfell Tower. They are not living in big fancy apartments in the West End of London so those in positions of authority they have got an attitude and an arrogance that they can do what they like.
“It upsets me, it breaks my heart.”


Related: UK Muslim sex gangs: “Could be Up to a ‘Million’ [non-Muslim] Child Sex Victims”

UK: Muslim Rape Gang Victim Whose Life Was ‘Destroyed’ Slams Rotherham Authorities
Shouts of ‘Allahu Akbar’ erupt in court as Muslim gang JAILED for child sex abuse/trafficking
UK: 72-year-old Muslim repeatedly rapes nine-year-old girl

WATCH: Muslim Men Threaten British Schoolgirls With Brutal Rape and Beatings DAILY
‘All [non-Muslim] girls are good for is sex. They’re just sluts’: Eight members of ‘openly racist’ violent Muslim sex gang raped and ‘sexually degraded’ three teen girls in Rotherham
: UK: Hundreds more Muslim child rape gang cases discovered; authorities still hiding them for fear of islamophobia charges
Another 14 Muslim men guilty of running UK child sex ring
Related: UK Police Concerned for Welfare of Convicted Muslim Child Gang-Rapists
UK: Hotel footage shows Muslim rape gang member luring 13-year-old girl
UK: Muslim child sex exploitation “now normal in parts of Greater Manchester”
2007 video on savage Muslim rape gangs not used amid fears of appearing “racist”
UK: Rotherham child sex abuse files “go missing from council archive
UK: Muslim Businessman Gets 8 Years For Grooming and Sexually Abusing 12-Year-Old Girl
Another Sex Gang Bust: 6 Jihad Pimps on trial in UK enslaving 6 non-Muslim little girls
UK: Yet Another Muslim Rape Gang Convicted of Sexually Abusing Schoolgirl
10,000 schoolgirls’ victims of U.K. Muslim sex gangs
UK Police Receive 500 More Muslim Sex Grooming Allegations ‘Within The Last Six Months’
BBC finally airs the shocking truth: Muslim Men Grooming, Raping, and Pimping Young Sikh Girls
Gang of Muslim men ‘groomed girls as young as 11 for sex, trafficked them across the UK and attacked them with meat cleavers and baseball bats’
Girls, 14, ‘groomed and raped at drug den by Muslim gang who treated her with contempt’
Hundreds of members of the Luton Sikh community protest police failing to investigate Muslim sex attack on a young non-Muslim girl
Police Ignored Victims of Muslim Child Sex Trafficker who recruited non-Muslim child “prostitutes”; Detective: “the worst case I’ve ever
had to deal with in my 22 years of service”

Groups decry bogus “Asian” label
Govt Minister: “Britain Needs Open Debate” about sex grooming gangs … what about root cause?
Another Muslim Gang Busted in “Second Child Sex Ring” of young non-Muslim girls
More Muslims Jailed for Raping, Grooming Tween girls, 40 More Sought
British Judge: “Targeted because they were not part of your community or religion”: Judge blasts sex gang
UK Child Sex Trafficking Trial: Nine Muslim men guilty of exploiting
non-Muslim schoolgirls for sex and prostitution after plying them
with vodka and drugs 

Girl, 17, tried to kill herself after ordeal at Muslim sex trafficking trial
Another Muslim Child Sex Trafficking Gang Busted in the UK
UK Police probe at least 54 more Muslim child sex slavery gangs
UK Imams promote Muslim sex slavery rings brutalizing, raping very young non-Muslim girls
Police Refused to Halt Muslim Rape gang: Police and social workers apologise
to girls tortured by ‘medieval’ savage predators, but chief constable
refuses to resign

Muslim Gang Rapes, Brutalizes Kidnapped 13-Year-Old over 4 Days: ‘You treated her like a piece of meat’ Judge’s fury as he jails Muslims who forced her to be their sex slave
Jihad in UK: Muslim men in child trafficking sex ring, attacked vulnerable
girls as young as 11 for sex, subjecting them to assaults that were “perverted in the extreme”

Muslim Child Sex Trafficking Ring gang-raped, bought and sold young infidel girls aged 11 to 16 for 8 years, branded ‘M’ for Muhammed on buttocks
Gang of Muslim men ‘groomed girls as young as 11 for sex, trafficked them across the UK and attacked them with meat cleavers and baseball bats’

Pamela Geller is the President of the American Freedom Defense Initiative (AFDI), publisher of PamelaGeller.com and author of The Post-American Presidency: The Obama Administration’s War on America and Stop the Islamization of America: A Practical Guide to the Resistance.

The Geller Report

Arrogance blinds, and blindness can lead to downfall. The 2016 election illustrates the scenario. The Democrats were positive that, after a bit of chicanery during the primary, Hillary would win. In their overconfidence the Dems mistakenly minimized the possible impact of discovered Russian hacking into the DNC, and who knows what else, as well as the Wikileaks revelations. The chief executive was so confident that Hillary would win that he did next to nothing about the intrusions and exposures that were so damaging to her image.
They completely failed to read the mood of the nation and the impact that Trump was having. He simply spoke to people’s concerns; whereas, the Dems were perceived to be Elitist. The phrase so often applied “out of touch” put it very mildly.
None the less, Hillary’s buddies in the MSM, DOJ and FBI had her back, and the chosen one threw his support behind her as well. Questionable polls showed her to be way ahead. No need for panic, all is well. What could possibly go wrong?
Well, on election night, crash, bang, detonation—Trump won!
What happened? All of the collusion, lies, votes cast by dead people and illegal aliens did not put her over the top.
What happened is that the American electorate did not buy into the Democrat narrative, saw through the glittering veil behind which Hillary  stood, and made their decision—much to the horror of the Democrats, the establishment politicians, and the elites.
What to do? When the truth wins, start lying, endlessly obstruct, begin ongoing phony investigations, utilize paid rioting, and conspire to get rid of the winner by any means necessary.
The Democrats built their election strategy with a house of cards that could not possibly maintain its structure. Can we say mindless self-destruction born out of arrogance. It appears as though they are doing the same with their post-election plan. Is it working? Not really. The voters are becoming fed up with all of the shennadigans and obstruction.
Beware, on the streets, Leftist thuggery and violence will not be met with passivity. Undoubtedly the paid useful idiots will abandon the “cause” leaving the die hard anarchists on their own. Who will win depends upon the will to keep up the battle, possibly until the last combatant falls.
Below are excerpts from five relevant articles with links.

Conspiracy:
In the post, Are Democrats behind the dubious Trump dossier that has triggered so many ‘Russia’ investigations? the National Sentinel gives much detail on the conspiring which actually began prior to the election:
Political espionage: President Donald J. Trump has so many enemies in the Deep State and political establishment swamp he seeks to drain he literally only has a small cadre of insiders he can trust.
But a new report suggests that the long-discredited “dossier” released last summer well before the election – which could not be verified by any of the scores of media outlets that had obtained it but nevertheless sparked many of the “Russia” investigations – may actually be tied to the Democratic Party.
Investigative reporter Paul Sperry, writing for the New York Post, notes that the dossier is tied to a secretive Washington, D.C., firm that commissioned it and is now thwarting congressional investigators looking into its connection to the Democratic Party.
He writes:
The Senate Judiciary Committee earlier this month threatened to subpoena the firm, Fusion GPS, after it refused to answer questions and provide records to the panel identifying who financed the error-ridden dossier, which was circulated during the election and has sparked much of the Russia scandal now engulfing the White House.
Is Fusion GPS hiding something? …congressional sources describe it as an opposition-research group for Democrats, with the founders much more political activists with a pro-Hillary, anti-Trump agenda than journalists (which could actually describe just about every other “mainstream” media journalist in D.C.).
“These weren’t mercenaries or hired guns,” a congressional source familiar with the dossier probe said. “These guys had a vested personal and ideological interest in smearing Trump and boosting Hillary’s chances of winning the White House.” continue for much more

Lies: 
Cryin’ Chuck Schumer Blasted for Lying About President Trump

Do you happen to recall the time that Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer – desperate to make political hay out of a Supreme Court nomination his party couldn’t prevent – tried to tell the country that President Trump was under FBI investigation? The Democrat playbook of the last six months has been to throw so many lies and insinuations at the public that America simply loses track of them all. So by the time their lies are exposed AS lies, everyone will have moved on to the next big non-scandal.
But now that Schumer’s lie has been exposed, at least one Republican thinks we should go back and recall how the Senate’s top Democrat tried to mislead the American people. Sen. Chuck Grassley wants America to remember exactly what Cryin’ Chuck said in March:
“You can bet that if the show was on the other foot and a Democratic president was under investigation by the FBI,” said Schumer at the time, “that Republicans would be howling at the moon about filling a Supreme Court seat in such circumstances. After all, they stopped a president who wasn’t under investigation from filling a seat with nearly a year left in his presidency.” More here

BUSTED! CNN Producer Admits Their Coverage Of Trump is a WITCH-HUNT! (VIDEO)
CNN is going up in flames with a bombshell undercover video that was released that shows a producer at CNN admitting that their coverage of President Trump is complete garbage that is designed just to get ratings.
Partial transcript below:
CNN Producer: Yeah, so even the climate accords, it’s like okay, a day or so but we’re moving back to Russia.
Undercover Journalist: So I understand it’s all ratings, right?
CNN Producer: It’s a business, people are like the media has an ethical phssss… But, all the nice cutesy little ethics that used to get talked about in journalism school you’re just like, that’s adorable. That’s adorable. This is a business. Complete post and video here

The Total Conservative asks, Can the President Really “Obstruct” a Fake Investigation?
Let’s put it plainly: If the U.S. government could prove that Donald Trump or his associates colluded with the Russians to hack the Democratic National Committee last year, Trump would not be president right now. In fact, we strongly doubt he would have ever been allowed within 100 miles of his own inauguration.
And if he HAD colluded with the Russians, the government WOULD have proof of it. Does anyone think otherwise? Does anyone believe for a second that the combined intelligence community of the NSA, the CIA, the FBI, and God knows what else could be duped by a New York real estate billionaire? We think Trump is well on his way to being a great president, but this would have been a job beyond any president in history. It’s unthinkable and ridiculous.
And with every passing day, the clarity with which we can understand that this entire investigation was a fraud all along gets stronger and stronger. It’s hardly even a matter of debate any longer. Trump did not collude with the Russians. End of story. continue

The rage:
Jonathon Clay de Hale discusses The Failure of Leftist Restraint 
in his excellent article posted on the Illinois Family Institute site.
The shooting of GOP House Whip Steve Scalise and several other Republicans during an early morning baseball practice this month is as unsurprising as it was dreadful. Some of our deepest expectations were realized in that moment, as the furious rhetoric being churned out by the Left finally expressed itself in the ultimate form of contempt: an attempt to assassinate political leaders….
It started with words from everyone from Obama to Madonna….
While the words broke an unspoken decorum, they weren’t much without action. Mobs gathered and marched with signs that read, “Become ungovernable” and “This is war” and “The only good fascist is a dead one.”
Violent protests shut down presentations deemed hate speech on college campuses: Dr. Charles Murray at Middlebury College, Ann Coulter and Milo Yiannopoulos at the University of California, Berkeley.
From there it was only a few steps to acting out murder fantasies in the form of “art”: comedienne Kathy Griffin decapitating Donald Trump; rapper Snoop Dogg shooting Donald Trump in a “music” video; and a Shakespeare play featuring the murder of “Julius” Trump.
Entire article here and well worth the read!

The Insane Intolerance:
Slate: Women Won’t Be Equal Until They Murder and Rape More People, LGBT Conservatives are ‘Villains’
“These men are more than just bad actors on the national stage: They seek influence and use it for evil means, then show no remorse,” wrote Cauterucci about gay conservatives in her article, Queer Villains Remind Us That Gay Does Not Always Equal Good. “They are comic book–level villains. And they also happen to be two of the most visible gay men in America.”
Cauterucci then claimed in her article that women won’t be equal until they start murdering and raping more people.
“This is a good lesson for straights to learn, too. I have long believed that women will not have achieved full gender equality until we make up half the world’s mass murderers and sex offenders,” she declared, adding, “Not that I would advocate for more mass murderers and sex offenders, but I do wish, kind of, that women made up a greater share.”
“If people believed women to be capable of terrible violence, they might believe us to be capable of everything else—the presidency, for instance,” Cauterucci proclaimed. “Visible gay villains teach the world that queers aren’t all lovable Ellen DeGenereses, glamorous Laverne Coxes, sharp-witted Anderson Coopers, and goofy Neil Patrick Harrises. Equality means having the freedom and power to be just as fucked up and insufferable as anyone else.”  Continue 

Knowledge Is Power: The Realistic Observer is a non-profit blog dedicated to bringing as much truth as possible to the readers.

Nothing like a festering personal grudge to wreak an entrenched swamp denizen’s ire. Oh, the sleaze…
Excerpt:”By all appearances, Andrew McCabe took down Michael Flynn as a personal vendetta for Flynn’s support of a female FBI agent who had implicated McCabe in a sexual discrimination investigation, which led to the now universally debunked Trump/Russia fairy tale.”

The following article gives many more interesting details on the matter.

Swamp critter alert! The whole Russia fairy tale apparently began as a personal vendetta by FBI’s Andrew McCabe against General Flynn
by Thomas Madison

Deputy FBI Directory Andrew McCabe has been under a great deal of scrutiny lately and the subject of three separate federal “administrative inquiries,” one of which is an apparently egregious violation of the Hatch Act, forbidding FBI employees from involvement in partisan politics.
Now, a report is circulating that may implicate McCabe in an even more serious “matter,” to quote Loretta Lynch.
By all appearances, Andrew McCabe took down Michael Flynn as a personal vendetta for Flynn’s support of a female FBI agent who had implicated McCabe in a sexual discrimination investigation, which led to the now universally debunked Trump/Russia fairy tale.
McCabe should have, without hesitation, recused himself from the investigation of General Flynn due to his well-known animosity towards the general. The fact that he didn’t speaks volumes about his intent to take Flynn down, which eventually happened when Flynn was dismissed from President Trump’s cabinet.
McCabe also appears to be a very partisan liberal Democrat with ties to the Clintons, and his apparent hatred for President Trump is no secret.
According to direct sources at a social/professional function, “McCabe, the second highest ranking FBI official, emphatically declared at the invite-only gathering with raised voice: ‘Fuck Flynn and then we Fuck Trump.’ Many of his top lieutenants applauded and cheered such rhetoric. A scattered few did not.”

Andrew McCabe is obviously a swamp critter of the first rank and is EXACTLY the sort of vermin President Trump must remove from the beltway swamp before he can destroy even more lives.
From Circa
The FBI launched a criminal probe against former Trump National Security Adviser Michael Flynn two years after the retired Army general roiled the bureau’s leadership by intervening on behalf of a decorated counterterrorism agent who accused now-Deputy FBI Director Andrew McCabe and other top officials of sexual discrimination, according to documents and interviews.

Go here for much more

Source: The Powdered Wig Society

Continue reading

Debbie Wasserman Schultz

The swamp has been and still is far more infested with the poisonous snakes of corruption than thought possible. Even those who are aware of their existence do not know the full extent of the occupation.
Those in collusion are apparently working overtime to hide the odious reptiles supportive of their treacherous activities. Sooner or later, the heretofore mentioned denizens will be fully recognized and forced above ground.
Elected turncoat lawmakers and appointed bureaucrats will slowly be brought out into the light of truth.
What then?
Will the DC traitors from top to bottom be duly punished?

The following are but two examples of swamp behavior:

1. Debbie Wasserman Schultz
Democrat Secret Scandal – Is a Top Member of Congress Being Blackmailed?
Posted Friday, June 30, 2017 By C.M. Lopez

A strange spectacle—and possible obstruction of justice— involving former Democratic National Committee Representative Debbie Wasserman Schultz has been kept under wraps by Congress, flying under the radar until now. A messy, tangled web of suspicious connections and incriminating allegations, the scandal has led White House aides to suspect whether a top member of Congress is being blackmailed.
Confused? Let’s take a closer look at the scandal major media is keeping quiet about.
To refresh your memory, Wasserman Schultz resigned as the DNC chairwoman in July of 2016 after WikiLeaks published 19, 252 of her emails. The emails revealed how DNC leaders conspired to undermine Senator Bernie Sanders to secure Hillary Clinton’s nomination. Wasserman Schultz was told to resign by President Obama shortly after. Now, Wasserman Schultz finds herself embroiled in another scandal, which she seems to be keeping more tight-lipped about.
In February, a group of five Congress information technology (IT) employees fell under criminal investigation for allegations of stealing equipment from over 20 member offices, and committing serious and “potentially illegal violations” of House IT policies. The “leader” of this group is Imran Awan, who has worked for Wasserman Schultz since 2005.
In May, Wasserman Schultz threatened the US Capitol Police for investigating her office. After they had retained her computer as evidence in part of the Awan investigation, Wasserman Schultz apparently threatened the Capitol Police Chief with “consequences”, claiming that the computer belonged to her.
After the investigation, Wasserman Schultz kept Awan employed by her office as an “advisor”, leaving many both perplexed and suspicious. Why would she not only refuse to fire the suspect, but protect him after he had allegedly victimized her?
As usual with Wasserman Schultz, things don’t add up. continue here

2. Eric Holder
Midnight Tweet Suggests Eric Holder See Prison in His Future
by Tiffany Layne
The Washington investigations will eventually destroy the Democrats and half of D.C.


After 8 years under the dark cloud of Obama, it’s hard to predict how many guilty parties will emerge.
Holder obviously is lying awake with the investigation on his mind. Recently, the Senate Judiciary Committee announced they will open a probe into Former Attorney General Loretta Lynch’s efforts to influence the FBI investigation of Hillary Clinton during the 2016 Presidential election. Perhaps Holder’s tweet is a sort of warning aimed at Lynch. Actually, there are plenty of people he could be referring to.


As the Gateway Pundit reports:
“Fired FBI Director, James Comey is under scrutiny for admitting he gave the contents of his memos to a friend who then leaked to the press. Comey also threw Loretta Lynch under the bus when he admitted in a testimony that she directed him to refer to Hillary Clinton’s email investigation as a ‘matter’ in order to downplay the seriousness of the probe.
Acting FBI Director, Andrew McCabe is also under Federal investigation for THREE different inquiries. As previously reported, Andrew McCabe is being investigated by the Office of U.S. Counsel violating the Hatch Act according to a new report by Circa News“.

Or could he be warning former NatSec Advisor, Susan Rice who has received backlash for her unmasking scandal? Rice has also just agreed to testify before a House Intel Panel in a closed-door session.
Many people find the tweet both cryptic and bizarre…
However, Representative Steve Smith was happy to weigh in with a few clarifications.
“This is sick. HSBC laundered $10 BILLION in OBVIOUS drug cartel money, Holder blocked ANY criminal charges, THEN Comey joined their BOARD? pic.twitter.com/7U3Ky4dGxO

— Rep. Steven Smith (@RepStevenSmith)June 26, 2017
Just add that to the long list of scandals….


Being Black Won’t Save His Ass
Like Obama, Holder was the first black to serve in his position. And like Obama, he was one of the worst to ever hold the position.
Further like Obama, Holder committed crime after crime against the American people. With the two highest law enforcement officers in the land being black, these two provided cover for each other.
Those days are over for both of them. There may come a point where blacks in America may demand justice in the form of prison terms for each of these frauds.
Something tells me that Holder may have many sleepless nights. And his tweet forebodes what he knows is coming. complete article

Knowledge Is Power: The Realistic Observer is a non-profit blog dedicated to bringing as much truth as possible to the readers.